🔗 Share this article

Ten years following the UK embarked on a hurried referendum that divided the country and caused disorder, a advisory comes from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Policymakers and voters drifted into Brexit and the identical might transpire with a referendum on a unified Ireland, sparking upheavals for which nobody is ready.

That represents the warning from two prominent journalists from both sides of the Irish border who have teamed up to analyse the pros and cons of Northern Ireland departing the UK to create a different country with the Republic of Ireland.

Governmental Institutions Not Ready

Fintan O’Toole and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the administrative systems in Ireland and Britain are woefully unprepared for a potentially fraught and seismic public vote.

"The lesson of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that events can emerge unexpectedly and can gather momentum swiftly," the commentator stated. "In my opinion that the political architecture of our region remains very unstable."

New Title Seeks to Provoke Discussion

The pair have examined the political, financial and cultural rationales for any governmental shift in a book, Examining Irish Unification, published by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They aim to stir debate on the issue with a tour of public talks that will take them to Westminster soon.

"What haunts all parties, or ought to concern all involved, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," stated O’Toole.

"We should prevent a referendum on a binary, ambiguous question whose consequences have not been clarified because then you end up with an highly split population where those defeated are resistant to losing and the people who have won lack clarity precisely what it is that they have gained."

Governmental Mandate

Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland secretary of state is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unification if it seems probable that a majority would vote in favour.

Sinn Féin and other pro-unification groups claim this point is looming, and a non-profit named Ireland’s Future has garnered backing, but both governments and pro-UK factions downplay the likelihood, making it uncertain whether or when there might be a national vote.

Absence of Substantive Discussion

Partisan language for and against unity has masked the shortage of informed dialogue, noted the journalist.

"People tend to be for or against the concept but the actual thinking which may surpass that to make it possible hasn't for the most part happened. Much has occurred in universities but very few government figures or advocates seek to involve themselves with the fundamentals. For instance, what sort of state would you want? Unitary? Decentralised?"

Volume's Strategy

In the volume, neither author supports unification or the current situation. They authors two essays that aim for neutrality in laying out the case for a unified Ireland and the case opposing it, assembling financial and social figures, previous instances and structural examples.

Discussions range over flags and symbols, duties, healthcare systems, retirement funds, national debt responsibilities and the danger of unionist unrest. The aim is to enlighten and provoke dialogue.

"There is significant curiosity in the topic but there has not yet occurred a debate," stated O’Toole. "Debate implies an acceptance of the notion that there may exist valid points on either side."

Simultaneous Plebiscites

A public vote in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the Republic of Ireland, where citizens say they prefer unification but oppose increased taxation or implementing a new flag to reflect pro-UK communities' British culture.

"Authorities in Dublin must work out what the proposal from pro-unification movements is other than just saying: 'We seek a unified Ireland and we love you'," remarked the commentator.

Probability of Public Vote

The journalist thinks a referendum in his era is likely and that it may take place suddenly. "There might be just a mad or a bad or a incompetent government minister who declares: 'Let's just do this and get it out of the way.'"

Both nationalists and unionists have reasonable, justified points, he stated. "Somebody will win on this issue and the other side will in the end lose but each side has has important lessons to learn from the alternative positions."

Appeal for More Extensive Debate

Westminster needed to participate in the dialogue, stated O’Toole. "This involves Britain. It's a UK matter just as much as it is an Irish issue."